Having seen the original performance by Genesis in 1974, I was excitedly telling my friends that this would be like the original only with better sound.
Unless the band was going for the full 70s Genesis re-enactment that included flawless performances marred by their legendary spotty sound mixes, Sunday night's show was a major disappointment, especially for someone who took time off work and drove 230 miles just to see the event.
The sound man broke the cardinal rule of live front-of-house mixing, which is ALWAYS keep the vocals at the very front of the mix.
We came basically to hear a band with a guy singing like PG, and left wondering exactly how much he sounded like Peter, because we could never really hear the guy.
The sound was so muddled that no one instrument was really ever 'in the pocket".
The whole mix was overpowered by keyboards and drums, bass was muddy, lead guitar typically showed up only on solos. You had to look at the guy sometimes, just to see if he was playing or not.
I spent time standing next to the house board, in case the acoustics at my seat were causing the problems, but the mix there was identical, so he seemed to hear something different from the rest of us. Everyone I spoke to after the show mentioned the sound..
I'm happy to acknowledge the problems in mixing a band like this, but I'm a sound guy, and have seen perfect mixes of great complexity accomplished with a lot less technology than these guys had. That was a great system in a great acoustic space, and the band should have just sounded completely god-like.
As previously mentioned, the actual stage performance was electrifying and virtually flawless, with the band performing even the original costume-change improvisations note-for- note, as far as I could tell.
I'd love to tell you how much the vocals sounded like PG, but I can only say that he sounded pretty good in the few times we could really hear his voice.
I totally loved the entire performance, but left really frustrated by the fact that it was so hard to hear it properly.
A few other notes re the performance.
It's really very weird to have the players twiddling and tuning up so LOUDLY over the introductions to the musical pieces. The lead guitarist seemed oblivious to anything going on around him in between some pieces, completely drowning out parts of the vocal narrative by testing out his guitar sounds, and destroying the atmosphere surrounding the story. What's with that?
Gotta say the songs that faded out were a little problematic, as if the guys really didn't know what to do with them and were afraid of improvising anything for fear of offending the purists. I see a great opportunity to let a little of the band's own character slot in and create some interesting finishes.
Also, speaking as a performer and a bit of a purist, coming onstage and tuning up and twiddling loudly prior to the performance went out of fashion in the '80s; again, it kind of blows the suspense and anticipation of the start of the show. Come on guys, blast out some Scarlatti or something to open the show, and do yer tuning and twiddling quietly under that. That's what The Guys used to do.
All whining aside, I ( and everyone else in the hall) loved every minute of this performance, and found it amazingly close to the original as I recall it.
The tumultuous applause brought the guys back for two wonderful encores, the eponymous Musical Box, and a earth-shaking rendition of Watcher of the Skies.
A truly fantastic band who gave everyone got their money's worth
I can't wait to see them again, but I hope they figure out their sound problems.
Otherwise, the next time they play in SF, I'll be the guy yelling " We can't hear the vocals" in between the songs. :)