Beatles Vs. Stones Tickets

Highlights: Beatles Sgt. Pepper outfits... Stones "Honky Tonk Women" stick around for the encore (no spoilers!)

Beatles cover band was great! Stones cover band was terrible. Lead singer butchered the music. Also expected a battle, and they only battled once.. which turned out great! Overall though, the show was a disappointment.

What a show! Brings back memories of my teenage years! Both bands were great and did a real tribute to the Beatles and the Stones! Also the Hard Rock Rocksino at Northfield Park is a super place for an evening out.

Bands were so great. Seating was excellent. Over all a fantastic experience.

The Beatles AND the Stones musicians were fabulous - it felt like we were reliving the real concerts we saw years ago. We loved the transition from older music with appropriate costume to the more recent years' music and costume. The musicians were not only talented, but fun and interacted with the audience. The finale with the groups coming together was incredible. We really enjoyed the evening and would see them again!

Both bands sounded great had lots of energy very enjoyable

Nostalgic! We had a great time! Would definitely see again.

Awesome show. Great music. Entertaining. Brought us back to the great music of the 60's.

Really good show at my favorite venue. I am a lifelong Rolling Stones fan and didn’t expect to really even like a Stones cover band yet alone one of the Beetles. These guys sound really good and the energy is fantastic.

Saw this show twice. Once back in 2016 and again in Feb. 2017. The first time was so good we decided to go again. The second show was disappointing. 1. The "Mick Jagger" performer was different and the new one did not have the same stage presence as the first one. 2. Both Bands seemed to cut down the number of songs in each set. 3. The sound at the venue was not good. At times you would lose the vocals as they were drowned out by the instrumental. Doesn't seem like their sound engineer is paying attention.

A comparison is perhaps not fair as The Beatles and The Stones were/are 2 very different bands. Both groups were portrayed as the younger bands, and again 5-6 years into their careers. The costumes and hairstyles changed with the years. In the case of the Stones, some of the group members changed. We saw Brian Jones, Mick Taylor, Bill Wyman come and go, and then Ronnie Wood come and stay. The portrayal of the characters of Mick Jagger, John Lennon, and Keith Richards were outstanding. I had to marvel at the toss of the head from Keith, the way he makes this "duck face" when he's playing and really enjoying himself, excellently done. Even the speech pattern matched in the actors that had speaking parts. The guitar playing was quite good in both bands. I enjoyed the drumming, but the drummers were hidden from view from me as the keyboard was in the way. The music of the Stones is not as easy to play as the music of the Beatles. The Stones have a special sound that didn't quite come through, and maybe it shouldn't. I know the real Keith spent a lot of time perfecting that sound, and only he can do that. However, the music was energetic and got the audience to their feet. There was a special touch, a local high school string section played some songs with both bands. I definitely recommend this show!

Both bands did a great job of covering the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. Costumes, mannerisms and voices were spot on. Very fun to sing along with

Both tribute bands were really good! Beatles sounded great musically. Stones rocked! Singer looked amazingly like a young Mick Jagger! Same for the Keith Richards - uncanny! I highly recommend this "concert"!!

Interesting concept with a battle of the bands that were Beatles came out strong with an excellent first-half but the Stones took the prize in the second half

I would definitely go again and would recommend this to anyone. Very entertaining!

Both groups were very talented and quite witty. I would expect this show to take off in popularity soon. "Mick Jagger" was a particular dead-ringer!

Saw this show in Laughlin, and so glad we went! Both bands are wonderful musicians/entertainers that make for a memorable, fun, and high energy night!!! "Mick" is hilarious and sexy, while "Paul and John" made me feel , just 17! The whole crowd got into this tribute and we enjoyed hearing so many classic- favorites! Their costumes and wigs helped you get into that period and for awhile....be lost in the great music! Which band was better? From Day Tripper to Beast of Burden... It was a smashing tie! Awesome! Anyone who doesn't love this show.... Is not a rock n roll fan! Go see it!

The show was a decent show. The Beatles started out and did a decent job. I am a huge Beatles fan and had such high expectations for them putting on a great show especially reading that they are the 'worlds foremost Beatles tribute band' well I disagree but did enjoy the show nevertheless. Then the Stones came out... They were terrific. The lead singer I believe was Mick's own son. They were very entertaining. I did not expect either band to dress up like their bands, this was okay, but to see these guys in wigs and garb from the era was okay, but a 70 year old guy in a mop top was over the top. I would have enjoyed it just the same if not better in their street clothes. Both bands were great musicians. The music was great. The Keith Richards humor was right on. I am glad I went... but I would not go again.