I was very excited to see Rain, but about a quarter of the way through the show, I realized I wasn't at a Broadway Show. In reality, it was a concert, nothing more.
I must say, the performers' mannerisms were spot on. It was great to see four guys that have obviously worked hard to perfect every little gesture. This really was quite impressive.
Before the show, there was some trivia being displayed....nice touch....except half the questions dealt with Beatles films, one of the least interesting aspects of the band for those really into them. No biggie though, as we were all pretty excited about the show about to start.
The opening act was excellent. It was really cool to see these four guys come out and perform the Ed Sullivan Show songs. They sounded excellent and, as mentioned, looked and acted just like the Beatles. The crowd was pumped and we were off to a good start.
As the show wore on though, it became clear that this was about all there was too it. The guys would perform a few songs, the curtain would close, and the little video screens would either play retro commercials or some bogus, "seen-em-a-thousand-times" clips of the actual Beatles or other cultural phenomena of the period were were experiencing. Honestly though, those clips, for me at least, were not that interesting and pretty much cliche....nothing new or exciting here. It seemed to me that they were pretty much going for the "vanilla" presentation here....nothing to write home about.
So, those clips would end and the curtain would rise to the guys in different outfits....ready to tackle another "era." Again, the songs were great (of course!) and the performances were fine, but where was the story? Where was the creativity? Is this all they're going to do....just play songs all night?
Now I'm a person that LOVES music. Going to concerts is a way of life for me. Honestly though, if I wanted to go see a Beatles cover band play, I'd cruise to BB Kings to see the band Strawberry Fields or just remember how cool it was to see Beatlemania back in the day. I paid top dollar to see a Broadway show and instead went to an under-two-hour concert. It got to the point where the band even treated it like a concert and was talking to the audience....I don't know...it just didn't feel like they put much effort into it and just basically did their basic sets. There were moments where they even stepped out of character to talk to us about how cool it was to be doing this gig. Again, not at all what I expected. I really thought we were going to be treated to a storyline....something special....some unique insights into the Beatles' thought process as they moved through their miraculous ten years. It was not to be and during the intermission I found out I was not alone in this assessment.
After I realized we were in for the concert and nothing else, I just decided to get into it as best I could....enjoy the music....dance, whatever. Then, out of nowhere, during the latter years set, it became obvious that they were lip synching at times. It got really bad (and distracting) when "John" was singing "Strawberry Fields" and the supposedly live video of him singing got totally out of synch with the sound coming from the speakers....worse than a bad Japanese film. I'd go back to watching him singing it live and found out it was the same....OFF! What the? This happened three separate times and it became clear that a lot of what we heard was on tape, including some of the instrumentation. It wouldn't have been such a big deal if the mouth wasn't so out of synch, but so be it.
It's very difficult to reproduce Beatles' music from their latter years. The sounds that George Martin helped create are extremely challenging. "Rain" really did a pretty solid job on most of the songs, but chose to change a few endings here and there to make things easier, I suppose.
As for the performers, I thought "Paul" was amazing. He just really nailed McCartney. "Ringo" was great too. "George" and "John" had the mannerisms down pat, and were both great musicians, but only sporadically nailed their characters. I thought "John" was the weakest.
All in all, I was disappointed and really expected so much more. If you've never seen or studied the Beatles though, you probably owe it yourself to check this out.