This play needs to decide what it wants to be: a play about the young Elvis and his music, or a social commentary on Civil Rights. The fact that Elvis was heavily influenced by black music (gospel, "Hillbilly" and blues) is a crucial element in his development, no doubt. References to this are important and appropriate. But to devote at least a third of the play to Civil Rights issues of the 1950s, which did not involve Elvis, resulted in a disjointed and contrived plot. And for those who came to the play hoping to hear a lot of early Elvis music (close to 100% of us, I would guess), about 1/2 of the songs are performed not by Elvis but by black artists portraying Chuck Berry, Little Richard, and B.B. King. In other words, I felt as if I were seeing two musicals with two messages trying to come together.
The writing, and maybe the direction, was faulty also in the intermission and conclusion cuts. At intermission, the cut was so flat that the audience sat for a bit, wondering if it was intermission; same when the pay ended....just, blah. Thankfully, the ending was rescued by a rousing Elvis performance (finally) of his early hits.
I will also add that with all of the overt (and unnecessary) sexual references, this is not a family-friendly play.
On the positive side, I thought the performers were, overall, excellent, and the man who played Elvis in particular was a fine talent. About 20 minutes into the play, you do see him as Elvis. That is no small accomplishment.
The director spoke to the audience prior to the performance, emphasizing that this is still a work in progress. I hope that changes will be made soon, as I think the subject matter is rich and worthy of a focused and energetic treatment.